Sign In Forgot Password

A Bisl Learning - Fact of the Week

Compiled by Rich Remenick.

Beth Israel's Adult Education Committee is proud to announce the revival of the "Fact of the Week" series that ran throughout the course of our Holocaust Survivor Scroll restoration project. We are reinitiating the series in order to uphold not just the Torah that we know of as the 5 Books of Moses, but the broader Torah of the Jewish people's historical and cultural experience...the Torah of the Jews in the Yiddish speaking heartland of Poland-Lithuania, the Torah of the Jews of Spain, the Torah of the Sephardic Jews, etc. We may even revisit the town of Prostejov, where our Holocaust Survivor Scroll comes from! All this history contributes (in ways hidden and open) to our identity as Jews today, and our awareness of this history can only strengthen that identity and our community. This time the series will be different in that several successive weekly facts will be connected to each other through some significant theme in Jewish history. 

"We will either forfeit or enrich the legacy of ages." - Abraham Joshua Heschel

  1. Landsmanschaftn
  2. Community in the Old World
  3. What is the Jewish Community?
  4. An Obstacle to the Kehillah
  5. The Kehillah and Jewish Education
  6. Oy! There IS Jewish Crime!

Jewish Mutual Aid: Landsmanschaftn 

How did Jews support each other in times of crisis? (And when is there not a crisis?) Throughout history, Jews have responded in multiple ways depending on circumstance.

In the case of the mass migration of Jews from Eastern Europe to the cities of the United States, one response was the institution of landsmanschaftn, which were fraternal organizations based on ties to a hometown or region in the old country. These organizations alleviated the stress of a new and strange environment simply by providing a gathering space for people who could share memories of their town of origin. But they also provided material benefits such as burial services, financial aid to the sick and the indigent, and assistance with finding employment and job training. These organizations were so popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that, according to an estimate by the Yiddish Writers Group of the Federal Writers Project, there were as many as 3,000 landsmanschaftn in New York City in the 1930's, with as many as half a million to a million members!

These organizations were an important vehicle not just for the maintenance of ties from the old country, but for the formation of a new, specifically American Jewish identity. This is something we will explore in A Bisl Learning's next fact of the week.    

"We are either the last Jews or those who will hand over the entire past to generations to come. We will either forfeit or enrich the legacy of the ages. -  Abraham Joshua Heschel

(Return to Top.)

Jewish Mutual Aid: Community in the Old World

When Jewish immigrants from Europe arrived in America, they brought with them a solid legacy of community organization (and the skills that went with it) which they then had to adapt to modern American conditions. The landsmanschaften that we mentioned last week are an example of this process of adaptation. But what was the original organizational inheritance?

The Council of the Four Lands was the overarching Jewish governing body in Poland-Lithuania. The Council's authority was strikingly oligarchic: its leadership was selected almost exclusively from the wealthy strata of the community (or the most learned) and the percentage of the population that could actually vote for leaders varied from about 5% to 14%. The percentage of the Jewish population that was eligible for office was probably no greater than 5%. The Council regulated a large swath of the behavior and affairs of Jews, from proper apparel for poor people to the salaries of teachers. Even voluntary organizations, such as craft guilds, were closely regulated by the Council, which in some instances went so far as to select the leadership of these bodies. In short, the ordinances of the Council (which were thought to express the will of the community) were extremely wary about any assertion of individual interests, which were seen as a threat to community cohesion.

Newly arrived Jewish immigrants had to grapple with these thorny questions of individual and community. For instance, how is it possible to build a community in a more free and open environment in which so many individuals know that they can leave the community, and may actually do so? Another response to this dilemma (besides the landsmanschaften) was a great Jewish social experiment in New York City that took place from 1908 to 1922, an experiment which we will talk about in our next fact of the week. (Return to Top.)

Jewish Mutual Aid: What is the Jewish Community?

In September, 1908, an article appeared in the periodical North American Review. Written by the New York City Police Commissioner, Theodore A, Bingham, the article stated flatly that half of New York City's criminals were Jews (mostly Russian). The prestige of the author and the seemingly impeccable statistics cited made the accusation seem "respectable" and therefore even more painful to the pride of an already struggling Jewish immigrant community.

A storm of outrage and indignation emanated from the Yiddish speaking immigrant population of the Lower East Side. All six of the Yiddish daily newspapers carried the story, along with angry commentary. A call went out for the resignation of the Commissioner. Eventually a deal was struck in which the Commissioner apologetically retracted his statement but kept his job. But the injury to the pride of Lower East Side Jewry still smarted. Nothing short of an entity (a kehillah) that could govern Jewish community affairs and organize and articulate Jewish aspirations could restore the Jewish community's dignity.

But before a city-wide kehillah could be created, all sorts of divisions within the Jewish population had to be managed. Different factions argued over the definition of the term "Jewish Community" and who it included. Did "Jewish" mean religiously observant? Did it mean "ethnically" or "nationally" Jewish? And if either of these, precisely what did those terms mean? The story of how these issues were resolved, and how a kehillah was constructed will be next week's Fact of the Week. (Return to Top.)

Jewish Mutual Aid: An Obstacle to the Kehillah

The deal whereby New York City Police Commissioner Bingham got to keep his job (in return for retracting his inflammatory statement about Jewish criminality), was brokered by prosperous, politically influential, less recently arrived and more Americanized (mostly German) Jews. They felt duty-bound to restrain the "hot-headed", "impulsive", and "self-righteous" demands of the unruly East Side Jews for the Commissioner's removal. Some of the uptown Jewish elite believed the Commissioner's statements about Jewish criminality to be true!

The East Side Jewish community, on the other hand, depended on the financial largesse of these wealthy "elite" Jews, and this only inflamed its sensitivity to the patronizing disdain of the uptowners. Suspicion and hostility abounded on both sides, constituting a serious obstacle to the formation of a city-wide Jewish governing body, a kehillah.

A great rabbi, Judah Magnes, was essential in bridging these divisions. Judah Magnes had wide ranging interests, a pragmatic temperament, and a powerful speaking style. Even though he was the chief rabbi of the elite, uptown Temple Emanu-el, he was beloved by the East Side community for leading a march up Fifth Avenue of 150,00 East Side Jews in protest of Russian pogroms. His connections to varied segments of the Jewish community, and his skillful cajolery, allowed him to sell an inclusive vision of the kehillah, which had to be tolerant enough to embrace all those who would join. In his vision, the leadership skills of the uptown Jews would merge with the ardor of the Lower East Side to produce a successful kehillah. Without his efforts, a kehillah might never have been born. (Return to Top.)

Jewish Mutual Aid: The Kehillah and Jewish Education

The New York City Kehillah experiment (1908-1922) was at least partially successful in the area of Jewish Education. The research conducted by the Kehillah's Education Bureau (which included Rabbi Mordechai Kaplan) painted a portrait of East Side Jewish education as unprofessional, substandard (even corrupt), and not even accessible to most Jewish young people, many of whom received no Jewish education at all. Most children who did receive Jewish education attended small, improvised schools (called hadarim) run by a few poorly educated and commercially harried men in dilapidated buildings or basements.

The Education Bureau tapped a professional educator from Baltimore, Dr. Samson Benderly, to attempt to organize a comprehensive Jewish educational system in the city. Benderly's policy of modernization accepted the primacy of the American public school as a vehicle of "Americanization" of Jewish youth. Jewish education was to be "harmonious to and complementary with" the American public school system. Under Benderly, Jewish education in America became truly modern in its pedagogical techniques.

Along with such innovations as standardized text-books, curriculum, and professional teacher training, Benderly acknowledged that the typical Jewish student would be tired from a day of public school attendance. Benderly therefore reduced the number of required hours of Jewish education to half the requirement of traditional schools! How the Orthodox rabbis on the East Side howled! And how grateful are modern Hebrew School students! They can all give thanks to Dr. Samson Benderly. (Return to Top.)

Jewish Mutual Aid: Oy! There IS Jewish Crime!

The issue of "Jewish Criminality" in New York City seemed to cool to a slow simmer after Police Commissioner Bingham retracted his famous 1909 statement that 50% of the city's criminals were Jews. It came to a furious boil once again in 1912, when a well-known Jewish gambler named Herman Rosenthal was gunned down on the street a few days after he publicly described an extensive network of crime on the East Side. Rosenthal's killer was his disgruntled former partner who was also a police detective! The ensuing trial, with its lurid descriptions of the partnership between Lower East Side criminals and corrupt municipal officials, was covered on the front page of the New York Times for almost forty days.

No longer could the Jewish community dismiss accusations of Jewish criminality as mere anti-Semitism. The Yiddish daily newspapers agonized over the problem and its possible solutions. The Lower East Side chose to protect itself from hostile criticism by making sure its own house was in order. Accordingly, the Kehillah created a "Bureau of Social Morals" in August, 1912.

Donations from wealthy uptown donors financed the hiring of eight professional agents who supervised an extensive neighborhood intelligence network. With the cooperation of the mayor's office and the police, gambling resorts, brothels, and gang hangouts were harassed with surveillance, suspension of licenses, and criminal prosecutions. Rabbi Judah Magnes even managed to organize a "Horse Owners Association" to fight the scourge of horse poisoning (yes, apparently that was a thing)! Although this program successfully closed many criminal establishments, changing political tides and financial problems led to the end of this ambitious crime fighting effort by about 1917. (Return to Top.)

 

Wed, August 5 2020 15 Av 5780